Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example data from ABCD-J catalog #104

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jsheunis
Copy link
Contributor

Towards #103

Still to be addressed:

  • usedFor, which is confusing me... not sure how Activity and Entity need to be related to the dataset-version here
  • sampleOrganism and samplePart, very similar to the isAbout property discussed here: Example of a converted DATS metadata record #98 (comment), so could either use the already DCAT-supported "topic relation" or the newly added RDFS properties once that is merged.
# "usedFor": {
#     "@type": "http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#Activity",
#     "title": "Progression independent from relapse in ocrelizumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis cohort"
# },
# "sampleOrganism": "NCBITaxon:9606",
# "samplePart": "UBERON:0000955",

@mih
Copy link
Contributor

mih commented Mar 14, 2024

I had the exact same thoughts in a different context.

used_for would indeed implicate an activity. But activities are somewhat foreign things, because they are even less often capture by anyone.

My thinking re linking a project/publication would be to capture these as entities and do a qualified relation with CiTO:isCitedAsDataSourceBy, like in the penguin example.

I agree that the sample... properties are something like isAbout.

@jsheunis
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsheunis commented Mar 14, 2024

Thanks for the comments!

My thinking re linking a project/publication would be to capture these as entities and do a qualified relation with CiTO:isCitedAsDataSourceBy, like in the penguin example.

This feels like a nice and clean idea to me 👍 This would be another use case for the catch-all entity, right? #102

@mih
Copy link
Contributor

mih commented Nov 27, 2024

Merge after rebase prior to the next iteration.

@mih mih merged commit 2a8e02a into psychoinformatics-de:main Nov 27, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants