Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

STY: Use raw string notation for regular expression #3015

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024
Merged

STY: Use raw string notation for regular expression #3015

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 21, 2024

Conversation

j-t-1
Copy link
Contributor

@j-t-1 j-t-1 commented Dec 21, 2024

No description provided.

@codecov Codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.37%. Comparing base (4f2cd34) to head (b59565c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files 
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3015   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.37%   96.37%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        8764     8764           
  Branches     1595     1595           
=======================================
  Hits         8446     8446           
  Misses        190      190           
  Partials      128      128

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 merged commit dd6178b into py-pdf:main Dec 21, 2024
16 checks passed
@j-t-1 j-t-1 deleted the regex branch December 21, 2024 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@stefan6419846 stefan6419846 stefan6419846 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@j-t-1 @stefan6419846