Refacto: move profiles rules filter to generic class and use it systematically in jobs

[Guts]

This PR is a following up of #481 and #486.

After some real-life testing of the profile deployment rules, it became clear that the initial implementation was clumsy.

By placing the filtering of profiles based on rules in the qprofiles-synchronizer job alone, we forget that other jobs based on the content of downloaded profiles also need to respect the rules: qplugins-synchronizer, etc.

This PR fixes this by moving the rules filtering logic
right into the generic job class and make sure that every job which relies on downloaded profiles use the same method to filter on rules.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 19 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 70.19%. Comparing base (2a43596) to head (a0d5af7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #487      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.64%   70.19%   -0.46%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        3015     3013       -2     
  Branches      648      648              
==========================================
- Hits         2130     2115      -15     
- Misses        701      710       +9     
- Partials      184      188       +4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	69.56% <63.15%> (-0.46%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...loyment_toolbelt/jobs/job_profiles_synchronizer.py	41.83% <66.66%> (-8.96%)	⬇️
qgis_deployment_toolbelt/jobs/job_splash_screen.py	67.85% <0.00%> (-10.72%)	⬇️
...ployment_toolbelt/jobs/job_plugins_synchronizer.py	73.01% <40.00%> (-4.41%)	⬇️
...deployment_toolbelt/jobs/job_plugins_downloader.py	50.38% <50.00%> (-2.30%)	⬇️
qgis_deployment_toolbelt/jobs/generic_job.py	89.15% <78.37%> (+6.39%)	⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[jmkerloch]

LGTM !