Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Packaging: switch to pyproject.toml #556

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Guts
Copy link
Collaborator

@Guts Guts commented Sep 5, 2024

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added packaging Making the toolbelt usable on different ways and platforms. tooling Development tooling labels Sep 5, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Sep 5, 2024

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Sep 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.07%. Comparing base (5c8372c) to head (5e5d264).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #556   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.07%   71.07%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        3125     3125           
  Branches      669      669           
=======================================
  Hits         2221     2221           
  Misses        714      714           
  Partials      190      190           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 70.49% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
qgis_deployment_toolbelt/__about__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
packaging Making the toolbelt usable on different ways and platforms. tooling Development tooling
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants