Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ngram): ptr_arg #15

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024
Merged

fix(ngram): ptr_arg #15

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

shenxiangzhuang
Copy link
Owner

@shenxiangzhuang shenxiangzhuang commented Apr 23, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved the parameter type in a core text processing function to enhance memory safety and performance.

@shenxiangzhuang shenxiangzhuang added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 23, 2024
@shenxiangzhuang shenxiangzhuang self-assigned this Apr 23, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The primary update in this revision involves refining the function parameter type in the get_token_ngram_counter from a vector reference to a slice. This modification enhances safety and efficiency, aligning with coding best practices by resolving a specific linting issue flagged by clippy.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/ngram.rs Changed parameter type from &Vec<String> to &[String] in get_token_ngram_counter to fix clippy::not_unsafe_ptr_arg_deref error.

Poem

🐰✨
In the code's burrow, deep and wide,
A tiny change did Rabbit guide.
From Vec to slice, the types do hop,
Ensuring safety, no flop!
Cheers to code that's clean and bright,
Hop hop hooray, to the coder's delight! 🌟
🐰💻


Recent Review Details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9b2fdb and 0a670dd.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/ngram.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/ngram.rs (1)

7-7: The change from &Vec<String> to &[String] in the function signature is a good practice in Rust, enhancing flexibility and efficiency.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/ngram.rs (1)

Line range hint 20-20: The TODO comment about changing to use Counter to count ngram seems outdated as the function already uses Counter. Consider removing or updating this comment.

@shenxiangzhuang shenxiangzhuang merged commit 3c30402 into master Apr 23, 2024
8 checks passed
@shenxiangzhuang shenxiangzhuang deleted the fix/ptr_arg branch April 23, 2024 04:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant