Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow relative paths for root, crt and key in ca.conf #1894

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #372.

Do we have any end-to-end tests for this?

@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team label Jun 20, 2024
@marten-seemann marten-seemann requested a review from hslatman June 20, 2024 05:34
Comment on lines +188 to +191
cfg.Root[i] = step.Abs(root)
}
cfg.IntermediateCert = step.Abs(cfg.IntermediateCert)
cfg.IntermediateKey = step.Abs(cfg.IntermediateKey)
Copy link
Member

@hslatman hslatman Jun 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this logic can/should be part of config.LoadConfiguration. That should also allow for testing just this logic as part of the config package tests.

Changing the path in this way most likely results in a different value being marshaled and persisted at a different time. I think we should prevent that from happening. I think with how the config.Config struct is currently used, it'll likely require additional non-exported properties for the updated fields and a getter.

There are some "integration-like" tests that touch the config in https://github.com/smallstep/certificates/blob/master/authority/authority_test.go. They don't test the new behavior, but they can help in adding new tests for this. If you add new tests that operate on the appCommand, you can put them in a new sub dir of test/integration. I've recently started adding tests there, as we've generally been low on integration tests so far.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs triage Waiting for discussion / prioritization by team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use StepAbs for all files in the ca.json
2 participants