-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 820
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GateIO: Fix GetFuturesContractDetails for Deliveries and minor other fixes #1766
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
GateIO: Fix GetFuturesContractDetails for Deliveries and minor other fixes #1766
Conversation
Was returning the product of all the contracts, so 1444 instead of 38 contracts.
282c54b
to
cb7b226
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1766 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 37.37% 37.40% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 415 415
Lines 178627 178336 -291
==========================================
- Hits 66760 66715 -45
+ Misses 104089 103847 -242
+ Partials 7778 7774 -4
|
Using wrong error for pair not enabled
Especially fixes GetSingleContract, which seems misleading to not say Futures. There's a load of `GetSingle*` here that should probably also be fixed, but these two justified a dyno
dcf0c6c
to
77569e5
Compare
77569e5
to
e0ceb88
Compare
e0ceb88
to
ba00163
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
It's been a year, and I'm still getting caught out by govet demanding I don't shadow a var I was deliberately shadowing. Made worse by an increase in clashes with stylecheck when they both want opposite things on the same line.
c19f66c
to
f21d447
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
tACK!
GateIO
Was returning the product of all the contracts, so 1444 instead of 38 contracts.
Doesn't touch anything else around this; Futures asset split coming separately
Linter
Type of change
How has this been tested