[WFGP-265] Support setting a minimum stability level when provisioning #278
Conversation
|
Note that I will be away for a while, so if anyone is interested in the topic please feel free to do with this what you will; alter, redo, whatever. I'm not concerned about my name in any commit history. |
|
@jfdenise @jamezp @pferraro Note that a user would logically think about how the setting in this PR would apply to other use cases than the one discussed in https://wildfly.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/174184-wildfly-developers/topic/Provisioning.20preview.20stability.20extensions that led me to file WFGP-265, so it's good to think a bit about those. I think using it to restrict provisioning to a higher minimum than the process default would be a valid use, and probably what I did here would work, but I confess I didn't try. |
|
This PR handles it: #280 |
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFGP-265