-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ctffind_runner better error message #1212
ctffind_runner better error message #1212
Conversation
… every micrograph
Note I only tested for the SPA case but based on the contents of the file written here: Lines 487 to 490 in 05c903d
I guess for tomo the underlying issue is the same |
@huwjenkins Thank you very much. |
@biochem-fan is there a syntax that works for all possible shells? The user can choose this via Lines 104 to 108 in 05c903d
|
Oh, that is a pain. Does |
It worked when
in my SLURM submission script then although CTFFIND doesn't segfault, it doesn't run:
In fact the same behaviour occurs without my changes and using a version of CTFFIND I know works. |
worked, so I think it was a local issue. I've added the suggested |
Thank you very much for your contribution. I merged your patches. |
Thanks! FWIW |
Possible fix for issues like #1167? When CTFFIND fails to fit CTF parameters for all input micrographs (i.e.
MDctf
is empty) exit with an error rather than failing later.