Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RemoveEmptyJavaDocParameters should remove "empty" lines #98 #190

Conversation

alixina9
Copy link

@alixina9 alixina9 commented Oct 13, 2023

What's changed?

I added fixes for issue #98 regarding removing trailing empty lines and other fixes . Also updated tests and added new ones with the expected cases of what I thought made more sense.

What's your motivation?

Issue #98

Anyone you would like to review specifically?

@timtebeek maybe 🙂

Checklist

  • I've added unit tests to cover both positive and negative cases
  • I've added the license header to any new files through ./gradlew licenseFormat
  • I've used the IntelliJ IDEA auto-formatter on affected files

@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks a lot for getting this started @alixina9 ! I'd missed your PR earlier as I was traveling; from looking at your changes now I agree with when and where you'd like to see changes. There have been some changes to the main branch since though; would you be able to resolve the conflicts? You know best what you had intended. And feel free to start on the required code changes as well; and let us know if you need any help!

@timtebeek timtebeek added the bug Something isn't working label Oct 27, 2023
Laura Buchelova added 4 commits October 30, 2023 20:16
…ld-remove-empty-lines

# Conflicts:
#	src/test/java/org/openrewrite/staticanalysis/RemoveEmptyJavaDocParametersTest.java
@alixina9
Copy link
Author

alixina9 commented Nov 3, 2023

Thanks a lot for getting this started @alixina9 ! I'd missed your PR earlier as I was traveling; from looking at your changes now I agree with when and where you'd like to see changes. There have been some changes to the main branch since though; would you be able to resolve the conflicts? You know best what you had intended. And feel free to start on the required code changes as well; and let us know if you need any help!

I tried my best with resolving the conflicts, there were quite a few differences and I was already way on my way to fixing this issue 😄 If you have any suggestions to change things, let me know.

@alixina9 alixina9 marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2023 20:30
@koppor koppor mentioned this pull request Jun 4, 2024
3 tasks
@timtebeek
Copy link
Contributor

I want to thank you again for the effort you've put in here @alixina9 ; I'm sorry to have to admit I did not get to a timely review, and @koppor has since gone on to create #300 with a smaller changeset that was easier to review and see through. I hope this has not discouraged you from using or even contributing to the project in the future. Know that I feel bad for how long you've had to wait for feedback on this PR, only for it to be closed in the end for a different approach. It's happened to me in the past as well, and I know that can sting. Wishing you all the best there, and hope to see you around.

@timtebeek timtebeek closed this Jun 7, 2024
@koppor
Copy link
Contributor

koppor commented Jun 7, 2024

I think, @alixina9 also added "other fixes" regarding missing space between * and @param. Think, that could be discussed. However, I think, that autoformat is already taking care of that?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants